| Dear
Editor:
A few
hours ago I sat at a restaurant with my Elder before the
meeting of the Kiskiminetas Presbytery meeting to go over
the docket.
I told
her that we would be voting on Amendment B and she read
the current part of the Book of Order pertaining to that.
I summarized for her the part about Ministers, Elders and
Deacons are to lead a life of fidelity in marriage and chastity
in singleness.
She
was surprised there was no mention of homosexuals. I explained
how the Book of Order was interpreted that gays and lesbians
who are not married and were sexually active were precluded
from service by this section of the Book of Order. Of course
it also precludes heterosexuals who are living together
and not married from service also. (However, I doubt this
is as rigorously enforced or debated with such ferocity.)
The
vote at the Presbytery meeting a few hours later was 34
yes and 70 no: roughly the same as 8 years ago.
On
the way home, I wondered about the change in 5 states that
now legalize same sex marriage. So if a minister or elder
or deacon is in a same sex marriage, and are practicing
fidelity are they now eligible for service?
Some
legal experts say that a Supreme Court challenge will soon
come that under the "full faith and credit clause"
of the U.S.
Constitution that will force all states to recognize legal
marriage from those five states. Justice Scalia, has opined
in a dissent in another case that will force all states
to recognize same sex marriage.
I am
sure that it will soon come to pass that we will revisit
the meaning of 6. 0..... in the very near future.
If
same sex marriage is legal in some places, it will force
us once again to define and refine our thinking. Will our
church refuse to recognize valid legal marriages? Will our
church seek to define church marriage as different from
civil marriage?
Art
Seaman, HR
serving as Interim Pastor
New Bethlehem, PA
living
in Kittanning. PA
|